Skip to main content

HR: A Strategic Asset

Strategic assets are “the set of difficult to trade and imitate, scarce, appropriable, and specialized resources and capabilities that bestow the firm’s competitive advantage”.

It is easy to understand why organizations talk about people as an asset, but tend to manage them largely as a cost to be minimized. Aside from accounting principles that encourage this perspective, HR costs are easy to observe, while HR value creation is not. Largely because of the traditional perspective on HR, organizations have no way to measure HR’s strategic performance. Nevertheless, we know that intangibles in the aggregate are an increasingly important source of firm value, and that human capital ought to be a part of that asset value.

HR is a strategic asset as it can play a critical role in both strategy implementation and management systems. Namely, the ability to execute strategy well is a source of competitive advantage, and “people” are the lynchpin of effective strategy execution.

We think it simply means that firms do a reasonably good job of choosing the right strategy, to the point where this is no longer a differentiator. What does differentiate firms, however, is their ability to execute strategy effectively.
Organizational assets rise to the level of a strategic asset when they become a source of competitive advantage. Talent, commitment, and flexibility are desirable characteristics in a firm’s human capital, but are not sufficient to make people a strategic asset.

The ability to align both management systems and employee behaviors in way that works to implement the firm’s strategy becomes an “invisible asset” that tends to be idiosyncratic to the individual firm and not easily imitated by competitors.

Comments

  1. Replies
    1. This blog shares really huge and good information about my searching topic. It’s good to read it.


      Business Management

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Followership

“It is often said Today’s effective followers are tomorrow’s potential leaders” There are effective followers and ineffective followers Sheep There are people who are passive and like to work from 9-6. They think they work for living and lack initiative. They expect their leader to think for them. Most probably they may say, “Sir, whatever you think good for me”. They are also “Yes Sir”, “No Sir” type. Survivors There are some people whose motto is “better to be safe than sorry”. They do not take risk, tend to be political. They do not lead change but want to survive across it all costs. They are not someone who would rock the boat. You will find plenty of such people in Govt. offices.  Followership Model Alienated Followers They are capable yet cynical people. They come across as negative people. They generate and emit lot of negative thoughts and energy. They are seen gossiping in the corridor and criticizing their organisation and management. You will hear comment su...

Spiritual Workaholics

  With the COVID 19 Pandemic, working from home has become a new normal across the world. There are a number of studies conducted on how productive employees are, do they feel motivated? There are also lot of recent posts and articles on Employees working more hours than they worked while in office. Interestingly is ” Number of hour worked?” a criteria to measure employee performance and productivity? The employee working a greater number of hours than normal are often referred to as “Workaholics”. There are 2 types of Workaholics: 1 st type : Employees work greater number of hours because they love their job 2 nd type:   Employees work greater number of hours because they things are out of their control If we look at both the scenarios there is a critical difference between overworking. In the first case because the employees love their job and want to go extra mile, this leads to higher performance, productivity, and motivation. In the second case, because the em...

Reversing the Tide of CSR- From Followers (Employees) to the Preacher(Owner)!

“We reveal ourselves in metaphors we choose. A superior would think of what is right, whereas an inferior thinks only of what is profitable" In the most famous passages in Wealth of Nation, Adam Smith declares, “It is not the benevolence of the butcher, brewer or the baker that we expect our dinner, but from regard to their own self-interest. We address ourselves not to their humanity but to their self-love and never talk to them of our own necessities but of their advantages” This is often quoted in defense of self-interest. But what is missed is obvious. The self-interest of the butcher, the brewer and the baker is served only because they do indeed pay attention to our necessities, as well as to their own reputations of quality and fairness which is essential for the business they do so. It is precisely because they rise above their interest of others that make success. What they ultimately “sell” is their own Integrity. The old quasi argument still persists- o  ...