Skip to main content

Corporate Social Responsibility

Recent business scandals have shaken public confidence in corporate world. The Satyam scandal of falsified accounts and Lehman brothers collapse has placed such unethical behavior front and centre by the media. Such scandals may have exacerbated events such as 26/11, the economic downturn causing investors to abandon the stock market in search of investment opportunities. In the aftermath of these acts the business community should be rethinking its responsibilities to various public concerned in the operations. For Example “A new Guide from Non government Profit business for social responsibility out lies how ethical behavior should be embedded in company’s operation. Thus the Public is focused now more than ever on what firms is saying about “Corporate Social Responsibility”

CSR describes the relationship between business and society. An exact definition of CSR is difficult since beliefs and attitude regarding the nature of this association fluctuate with the relevant issues of the day. Milton Friedman contributed to the creation of General CSR theory by asking question such as “Should companies take responsibility for social issues?”He argued that business is to increase profits by legal means. Critics of this perspective argue that business exists to serve a larger community as well as direct and indirect beneficiaries of company’s operation.CSR may be in general terms be “The obligation of a firm to use its resources in ways to benefit the society through committed participation as a member of society taking into account the society at large and improving welfare of society at large independent of the company’s direct gains. Fulfilling companies ethical obligations to employees even meeting diversity needs are expressed in terms of their market place goals and objectives. The same principle can be applied to constituencies like customers, stakeholders. “What is good for General Motors is good for the country” is one of the CSR message directed toward the society.

Tomorrow’s Company, an independent, business led think tank, fears that CSR is moving in the wrong direction. In a paper entitled “Redefining CSR,” Tomorrow’s Company Director Mark Goyder worries that “CSR is at a crossroads and in danger of becoming the victim of its own success.” The paper defines two types of CSR: “compliance” CSR and “conviction” CSR. According to Goyder, “compliance” CSR is driven by external expectations and reporting pressures, and leads to a box-ticking mentality. On the other hand, “conviction” CSR is directed by the vision and values within a company; therefore, “behaviors flow naturally from the company’s purpose and values.” “Under [compliance CSR], CSR will not make a long-term impact on company performance and the society and the stakeholders companies serve. As companies take CSR more seriously something is being lost.
“CSR is too important to be left to CSR managers”.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Principles of CSR

Because of the uncertainty surrounding the nature of CSR activity, it is difficult to define CSR and to be certain about any such activity. There are three basic principles which together comprise all CSR activity. 1.Sustainability: If the resources are utilized in the present, then they are no longer available for use in the future. This is particularly pertaining to those resources which are finite in nature. Measures of sustainability would consider the rate at which resources are consumed by the organization in relation to the rate at which the resources could be generated. 2.Accountability: Accountability is concerned with the organizations realization that its action affects the external environment therefore assuming responsibility for the effects of its actions. It implies that the organization is a part of wider societal network and has responsibilities to the entire network rather than just to the owners of the organization. 3. Transparency It means that the external impact o

Followership

“It is often said Today’s effective followers are tomorrow’s potential leaders” There are effective followers and ineffective followers Sheep There are people who are passive and like to work from 9-6. They think they work for living and lack initiative. They expect their leader to think for them. Most probably they may say, “Sir, whatever you think good for me”. They are also “Yes Sir”, “No Sir” type. Survivors There are some people whose motto is “better to be safe than sorry”. They do not take risk, tend to be political. They do not lead change but want to survive across it all costs. They are not someone who would rock the boat. You will find plenty of such people in Govt. offices.  Followership Model Alienated Followers They are capable yet cynical people. They come across as negative people. They generate and emit lot of negative thoughts and energy. They are seen gossiping in the corridor and criticizing their organisation and management. You will hear comment such a

Fourth Industrial Revolution and Protection of Personal Information

  “We seem to increasingly trade privacy for convenience with many of the devices we routinely use” -           Michael Sandel (Harvard Professor) Have you given a thought on the information that is freely available about you without your knowledge? Have you ever experienced?   When you are searching for a holiday accommodation on any website, and you leave the booking incomplete…have you noticed the same hotel advertisement catching your eye as you browse through social sites be it Facebook, Instagram or any other online site? When you buy any specific items from any online site…have you noticed related  products being advertised to you? e.g. buying maternity clothes from website, you suddenly start noticing advertisements about other  maternity products, children clothes, toys? It all happens because of your information and preferences been tracked and monitored through a small cookie (its not the one we get in our kitchens). COVID 19 crisis and lock down has given human