Skip to main content

Prisoner’s Dilemma

“If everyone did CSR then everyone would be better off”

I think that this claim is probably true. In any case, today you will hear plenty of good arguments in this favor. The fly in the ointment, so far as trying to persuade business to adopt CSR is concerned, is that so long as it is not the case that everyone does CSR, there is an upfront cost to any business which takes the plunge, with no guarantee that there will be sufficient return on one’s investment.

While you do CSR and your competitor’s doing, they reap the benefits of your socially responsible behavior while you get nothing in return apart from the glow of satisfaction at being able to occupy the moral high ground.

The problem is familiar one from political theory. For example if everyone agrees that we need to do something about climate change. If we all did something about climate change we would all be better off. But everyone also knows that any country which takes the plunge and launches a unilateral carbon emissions initiative will be penalized economically and lose ground against their competitors. That’s why the EU agreement on climate change reached last week is so important.

Students of political theory are told the story of two prisoners who are planning to escape together.Unfortunately for them, the prison authorities have hit on the perfect plan to prevent any escape. If either provides evidence that the other prisoner is attempting to escape, the informer will be granted his freedom and given a million dollars. The prisoner’s would be happy neither to settle for escape without the money, but neither can trust the other nor to go for the extra million.
What would you do?

There is no technical solution to this problem in the form of a game plan which is guaranteed success. If our two prisoners find a way to trust each other, then they will make good their escape. But how are they to do this?

Trust can be won, but not compelled. And when you have someone’s trust, you can never be 100% sure that you have it. Along with trust you need faith.

"I hope one can see some relevance of this to the case of CSR"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Principles of CSR

Because of the uncertainty surrounding the nature of CSR activity, it is difficult to define CSR and to be certain about any such activity. There are three basic principles which together comprise all CSR activity. 1.Sustainability: If the resources are utilized in the present, then they are no longer available for use in the future. This is particularly pertaining to those resources which are finite in nature. Measures of sustainability would consider the rate at which resources are consumed by the organization in relation to the rate at which the resources could be generated. 2.Accountability: Accountability is concerned with the organizations realization that its action affects the external environment therefore assuming responsibility for the effects of its actions. It implies that the organization is a part of wider societal network and has responsibilities to the entire network rather than just to the owners of the organization. 3. Transparency It means that the external impact o
Post a Comment
Read more

HR: A Strategic Asset

Strategic assets are “the set of difficult to trade and imitate, scarce, appropriable, and specialized resources and capabilities that bestow the firm’s competitive advantage”. It is easy to understand why organizations talk about people as an asset, but tend to manage them largely as a cost to be minimized. Aside from accounting principles that encourage this perspective, HR costs are easy to observe, while HR value creation is not. Largely because of the traditional perspective on HR, organizations have no way to measure HR’s strategic performance. Nevertheless, we know that intangibles in the aggregate are an increasingly important source of firm value, and that human capital ought to be a part of that asset value. HR is a strategic asset as it can play a critical role in both strategy implementation and management systems. Namely, the ability to execute strategy well is a source of competitive advantage, and “people” are the lynchpin of effective strategy execution. We think i
2 comments
Read more

Followership

“It is often said Today’s effective followers are tomorrow’s potential leaders” There are effective followers and ineffective followers Sheep There are people who are passive and like to work from 9-6. They think they work for living and lack initiative. They expect their leader to think for them. Most probably they may say, “Sir, whatever you think good for me”. They are also “Yes Sir”, “No Sir” type. Survivors There are some people whose motto is “better to be safe than sorry”. They do not take risk, tend to be political. They do not lead change but want to survive across it all costs. They are not someone who would rock the boat. You will find plenty of such people in Govt. offices.  Followership Model Alienated Followers They are capable yet cynical people. They come across as negative people. They generate and emit lot of negative thoughts and energy. They are seen gossiping in the corridor and criticizing their organisation and management. You will hear comment such a
1 comment
Read more